Lo Presti 2010: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Journal_Article |author=Roberto Lo Presti |sort=Lo Presti, Roberto |title=Tradition as the genealogy of truth - Hippocrates and Boerhaave between assimilatio…“ |
K Textersetzung - „{{Verwendet}}“ durch „“ |
||
| Zeile 15: | Zeile 15: | ||
|keyword=Hippokrates | |keyword=Hippokrates | ||
}} | }} | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 6. November 2018, 12:34 Uhr
Zitierfähige Literaturangabe
Roberto Lo Presti: Tradition as the genealogy of truth - Hippocrates and Boerhaave between assimilation, variation and deviation, in: Studies in Ancient Medicine 35 (2010), S. 475-522.
Abstract: It is a matter of fact that rarely in the history of modern medicine has a physician gained such immediate and universal fame, and rarely has his contribution to medical knowledge and teaching been so promptly and almost unanimously recognized as a fundamental and, so to speak, a foundational one, as in the case of Boerhaave. In fact, the contribution he gave to provide medicine with a 'scientific' framework, and medical teaching with solid methodological bases, proved decisive. Otherwise, his appraisal of the Ancients (and especially of Hippocrates) and his will to refer to Hippocrates as a model for medical teaching were proverbial. Taking the corpus of his orations as a point of reference, I will thus try to elucidate 1) Boerhaave's main focus and theoretical goals; 2) the argumentative and methodological strategies he adopted in order to achieve them; 3) the position that the key-concept of 'tradition', the figure of Hippocrates, and the notion of 'Hippocratism' hold within these strategies.